Tag Archives: grassley

BOP’s Ambitious “Framework for the Future’s” Overshadowed Launch – Update for February 22, 2024

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

IG REPORT RAINS ON DIRECTOR’S PARADE

rainparade240222The tsunami of the Inspector General’s bad news (which I reported on Monday) threatened to wash away BOP Director Colette Peters’ rollout earlier last week of the agency’s “Framework for the Future,” an ambitious and obese plan “encompassing seven goals and over 180 unique initiatives… set to redefine the Bureau’s operations,” according to the BOP press release, which gushed:

The Executive Team, consisting of Regional Directors, Assistant Directors, and key figures from within the Director’s office, is personally overseeing these initiatives. Their unwavering commitment is geared towards propelling the agency forward, fostering a humane and secure environment, and preparing individuals for successful reentry into communities.

The BOP told employees in a video message last week that Peters had introduced the “Framework for the Future” and “engage[d] and empower[ed] the agency’s dedicated workforce with details about the seven goals.”

somebull240222C’mon, Ms. Peters, please empower your dedicated PR flacks to spare us the bureaucratic happy talk BS, And while we’re at it, seven goals?  One hundred eighty unique initiatives? Let’s keep it simple.

Writing in Forbes, Walter Pavlo said, “Peters was given a mandate by Congress to improve the BOP but many of those needed improvements have been problems for years. Office of Inspector General and Government Accountability Office have both authored scathing reports on the BOP. Peters, who appeared on 60 Minutes earlier this month, understands that the BOP cannot continue to operate inefficiently, and in some cases inhumanely, as it has for decades.”

Pavlo says many believe that Peters is “the agent of change needed to overhaul the BOP… which has been plagued by employee misconduct… increases in healthcare costs, understaffing, and infrastructure decay. The BOP has also had difficulty implementing the First Step Act… Delays in implementation have been caused by early misinterpretation of the law, computer glitches and a shortage of halfway house capacity.”

“The BOP has challenges and now Peters has outlined a plan to overcome them,” Pavlo says, but he warns that “it will not be easy.”

listenup240222Peters has taken a deliberate approach to the problems, which are legion. During her first year as Director, Peters conducted “listening sessions,” including the novel but quite reasonable requirement for wardens of the BOP’s 122-odd facilities to listen to former prisoners, crime victims, subordinates in prison management and line workers, and advocates for change in the system. Writing in a Federal News Network story, Pavlo and attorney Alan Ellis predicted that “[i]t will take another year to judge the new direction Peters wants to take the agency, but expect her to double down on her message of a more humane federal prison system.”

Last summer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) proposed making the director of the Bureau of Prisons a Senate-confirmed position in S.2284, the Federal Prisons Accountability Act of 2023. The same measure has been filed in the House of Representatives as H.R.4138 by Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-PA), a member of the House BOP Reform Caucus.

Pavlo and Ellis observed that “Director Peters has enjoyed a long honeymoon with lawmakers, but they will be looking for results in 2024 — and so will many prisoners and BOP staff members.”

Bureau of Prisons, Reforming the Federal Bureau of Prisons (February 12. 2024)

Forbes, Bureau of Prisons Director Lays Out Goals For Improving Agency (February 13, 2024)

Federal News Network, The Bureau of Prisons and the challenges going into 2024 (February 21, 2024)

S.2284 – Federal Prisons Accountability Act of 2023

– Thomas L. Root

Acquitted Conduct Rides Again on Capitol Hill – Update for November 7, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOUSE COMMITTEE SENDS ACQUITTED CONDUCT BILL TO FULL HOUSE

The House of Representative Committee on the Judiciary last Wednesday unanimously approved the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act of 2023 (H.R. 5430). Spearheaded by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), the bipartisan measure was approved 23-0.

acquitted230106

In September, Cohen introduced the bipartisan measure with Rep Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), with Sens Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) introducing a companion bill, S.2788, in the Senate. This legislation would end the practice of judges increasing sentences based on conduct for which a defendant has been acquitted. It will now advance to the full House of Representatives for a floor vote. The Senate has yet to act on the measure.

During markup of the bill, Cohen said, “Just about every Supreme Court Justice who’s been around lately – John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia… Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Clarence Thomas, going down to Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have all said this needs to be changed. So with that I would ask that we… arrive at justice. People should be convicted of proven crimes and sentenced for those crimes.”

The Sentencing Commission considered prohibited acquitted conduct from being used in sentencing last winter but decided the issue needed more review. On June 30, the Supreme Court denied review on 13 different cases raising the issue.

Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman said in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog last week that “this notable vote committee certainly does not ensure Congress will get this bill to the desk of the President, but it should serve as a strong message to the U.S. Sentencing Commission that it should have bipartisan support for any acquitted conduct reforms it might be considering during its current amendment cycle.”

H.R. 5430, Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act of 2023

S. 2788, Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act of 2023

Sentencing Law and Policy, Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act receives unanimous bipartisan support in US House Judiciary Committee (November 3, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Now’s Your Chance, Colette – Update for September 18, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

REDEMPTION FOR COLETTE PETERS IS AT HAND

kumbaya221003On Friday, I reported on last week’s furball at the Senate Judiciary Committee oversight committee hearing, at which Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters was soundly thrashed by senator after senator about her agency’s poor correspondence record when it comes to responding to Congressional inquiries.

Specifically, after being warned last fall (during an otherwise kumbaya hearing welcoming Peters as the new director after the unlamented departure of Michael Carvajal) that various letters and requests for information the Senate had sent to the BOP over the previous years had gone unanswered, Colette has let another year’s worth of Senate interrogatories pile up. Her excuse that answers to senators’ letters had to go through a “review process” was as lame as it sounded.

Committee chairman Sen Richard Durbin (D-IL) ended the contentious session with some good advice for Peters: “Senators take it very personally when you don’t answer their questions. More than almost any other thing that I would recommend I’d make that a high priority.” She promised to do better, albeit in a fuzzy way that promised no hard deadlines.

mail210312Lucky for Peters, her chance to turn over a new leaf on responding to Senate concerns has already arrived. Last Tuesday, Sens Durbin, Charles Grassley (R-IA), Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) wrote a letter to Peters “regarding allegations of serious misconduct” occurring at FCC Hazelton. The letter asked that DOJ and the BOP “immediately investigate disturbing whistleblower reports of abusive treatment of incarcerated individuals and other employee misconduct… These reports, combined with public reporting on FCC Hazelton’s dire staffing shortages and proliferation of weapons contraband, paint a grim picture of the institution’s inability to ensure a safe environment for those in BOP custody and employees alike.”

hazelton181106The problems at “Misery  Mountain” are nothing new.  The letter to Peters, however, is quite detailed, alleging that:

  • Hazelton staff released the wrong incarcerated individual from the facility after failing to properly identify the correct individual scheduled for release.
  • A group of inmates escaped from the prison camp and supervisory staff attempted to cover it up.
  • Supervisory Hazelton staff falsified documents, encouraged inmate abuse, and covered up alleged abuse and escapes of incarcerated individuals. The falsified documents include medical assessments, incident reports, duty rosters, and time and attendance sheets, along with requests to tamper with corresponding security cameras to cover up inmate escapes. The employees engaged in these practices have not been disciplined, and, in some cases, received promotions, despite open investigations into their misconduct.
  • A staff member punched a prisoner on camera.
  • Staff members use restrictive housing punitively against prisoners and engage in a pattern of physical abuse of inmates in the SHU.
  • Staff repeatedly use racial slurs against other staff members and prisoners.
  • Staff urinated on prisoner property.
  • Staff has forced prisoners to urinate and defecate on themselves as a condition of being released from restrictive custody.
  • Staff assaulted a prisoner, breaking his ribs.
  • Staff beat a SHU prisoner so severely that he had a seizure and had to be hospitalized.
  • Staff shreds personal inmate mail and failing to provide inmates access to their mail. 
  • The existence of an internally organized group comprised of staff at various levels within FCC Hazelton facilities that are partially responsible for the misconduct at the facility, known as the “Good Ol’ Boys Club”. 

The letter asks for information regarding the investigation of abuse by no later than October 3rd, including a list of abuse allegations at FCC Hazelton since 2013, a list of FCC Hazelton staff members who have been promoted or transferred while under investigation for inmate abuse, copies of all documents regarding crimes and transfers of BOP staff who have been charged with a crime at FCC since 2013, and the number of employees who continued to work with inmates while under investigation for inmate abuse

WBOY-TV in Fairmont reported that it asked the BOP for a statement and got this:

The Federal Bureau of Prisons responds directly to Members of Congress and their staff.  Out of respect and deference to Members, we do not share our Congressional correspondence with the media. 

Unbelievable220811That’s rich. According to the Judiciary Committee, the BOP doesn’t even share its Congressional correspondence with Congress.

One would think that the BOP cannot ignore this letter.  But then, no one’s lost money yet betting against Bureau of Prisons transparency.

Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (September 13, 2023)

Associated Press, Senators clash with US prisons chief over transparency, seek fixes for problem-plagued agency (September 13, 2023)

Letter to Merrick Garland and Colette Peters from Sen Richard Durbin et al. (September 12, 2023)

WBOY-TV, Whistleblower alleges staff are covering up abuse, escapes at FCC Hazelton (September 13, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Congress Is Back In Town… Little Has Changed – Update for September 12, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THEY’RE B-A-A-A-CK

Congress returned last week after its long August recess, ready to dig in and work on anything other than criminal justice reform.

equal220812

Last week, the right-of-center Americans For Tax Reform wrote all members of Congress urging passage of the EQUAL Act (S.524, H.R. 1062). Anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist argued that the crack/powder sentencing “unjustified disparity has resulted in the imprisonment of people who pose no greater threat than their counterparts convicted of cocaine offenses for far greater periods.”

Norquist argued that “it is a core, taxpayer-funded, government role to protect citizens from crime, and manage the criminal justice system. Taxpayers, and all Americans who cherish individual liberty, should take an interest that the criminal justice system is efficient and effective at protecting public safety, upholding the rule of law and property rights, while respecting the constitutional rights of citizens. Where there are failures, conservatives should work to fix the issue, just as we do in other areas of government.”

The Illinois Times last week reported that Sen Richard Durbin (D-IL), chair of the Judiciary Committee, said the EQUAL Act has failed to come up for a Committee vote “because of the opposition of a Republican member of the committee, whom he declined to identify.”

“One Republican wouldn’t go for 1-to-1, and we deal with consensus on the committee,” Durbin said. “I have him down lower – substantially lower than 18-to-1 – and I’m trying to get the other side that wants it to be 1-to-1 to accept a different figure. But that’s where we’ve been stuck for over a year. I’m going to do my best to get this moving.”

The unidentified Republican is undoubtedly Sen Charles Grassley (R-IA), ranking Republican on the Committee and co-sponsor with Durbin of a number of reform measures, most notably the First Step Act. Last December, Grassley’s proposal of 2.5-1 and nonretroactivity except with Dept of Justice consent in the so-called SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116) killed EQUAL’s passage in the last Congress. Now, 9 months later, nothing seems to have changed.

Meanwhile, in the wake of last week’s recommendation by the Dept of Health and Human Services that marijuana be rescheduled from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug, the White House last week asserted that President Biden has “always supported the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes,” she said. “He’s been very clear about that, where appropriate, consistent with medical and scientific evidence.

potscooby180713Marijuana Moment noted that “it’s not accurate to say that Biden has “always” backed cannabis reform. As a senator, he championed several pieces of legislation that ramped up the war on drugs.” Nevertheless, “if DEA goes along with HHS’s Schedule III recommendation, that would represent a major shift in federal marijuana policy, with an acknowledgment that cannabis is not a drug of high abuse potential and no medical utility.”

On the other hand, The Hill reported that advocates and policy experts say rescheduling marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act does not address the plethora of racial justice issues caused by current law.

“Rescheduling doesn’t address … the harm to marginalized communities,” said Natacha Andrews, executive director for the National Association of Black Cannabis Lawyers. “It doesn’t address the over-policing, it doesn’t address the immigration issues, it doesn’t address the access to federal services, and it’s not in alignment with what 38 states have done to regulate and legalize.”

“My initial reaction is that this is less than what the Biden administration promised specifically,” Cat Packer, director of drug markets and legal regulation at the Drug Policy Alliance, told The Hill.

MSNBC reported, “To be sure, moving marijuana to Schedule III wouldn’t dismantle the drug war or solve the host of problems needlessly caused by prohibition. Descheduling, or removing the plant from the government’s list of controlled substances, would make more sense and better align with Biden’s stated criminal justice views. Still, rescheduling would be historic, if only due to the historic stupidity that has kept cannabis on Schedule I to date.”

Americans for Tax Reform, Support for the EQUAL Act (September 8, 2023)

Illinois Times, Unjust Sentencing (September 7, 2023)

Marijuana Moment, Biden Has ‘Always Supported The Legalization Of Marijuana For Medical Purposes,’ White House Says Amid Rescheduling Recommendation (September 4, 2023)

The Hill, Marijuana rescheduling falls short of expectations on Biden (September 8, 2023)

MSNBC, What the federal ‘rescheduling’ of cannabis would (and wouldn’t) mean (September 4, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Is Senate Fed Up With BOP? – Update for July 13, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, SENATORS MAY BE TELLING BOP

Phineas T. Barnum reputedly said, “there’s no such thing as bad publicity.” But P.T. Barnum never served as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

badpublicity230714It’s been a rough ride. First, the Dept. of Justice Inspector General has issued a scathing report of BOP mismanagement and maladministration that led to the suicide of high-value celebrity prisoner Jeffrey Epstein and the murder of Whitey Bulger. There has been a steady stream of death-of-a-thousand-cuts reports of BOP employees being convicted of everything from inmate sexual abuse to cellphone smuggling to COVID fraud. The Washington Post fumed last week that “regardless of the offense, any unnatural death in custody is a failure of the prison system.”

This week has seen well-loathed U.S. Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar – serving an endless string of life sentences for an endless string of revolting assaults of women gymnasts – stabbed multiple times at USP Coleman by attackers unknown. BOP employees promptly blamed the attack on a short-staffed facility.

It wasn’t long before the Associated Press reported that Nassar was attacked inside his cell, “a blind spot for prison surveillance cameras that only record common areas and corridors.” The AP said, “In federal prison parlance, because of the lack of video, it is known as an ‘unwitnessed event.’”

It isn’t clear that even full implementation of the Prison Camera Reform Act (Pub.L. 117-321), hardly prevented Capitol Hill from finally having had enough of the BOP follies.

Enough is more than enough. After several half-hearted attempts to address BOP management weaknesses, a bipartisan group of senators yesterday announced the introduction of the Federal Prison Accountability Act of 2023 (no bill number assigned yet), intended to increase oversight at federal prisons.

FPAA would require the president to seek Senate advice and consent when appointing the BOP director, who would be appointed to a single, 10-year term. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said requiring Senate confirmation of the BOP director would “bring badly needed transparency and accountability to the federal prison system.”

“The Director of the Bureau of Prisons leads thousands of employees and expends a massive budget,” Grassley said in a press release. “It’s a big job with even bigger consequences should mismanagement or abuse weasel its way into the system.”

sexualassault211014It took awhile to get here. Following an 8-month investigation last year that revealed rampant sexual abuse of female prisoners and a failure to prevent recurring sexual abuse, Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) introduced the Federal Prison Oversight Act (S.4988) late last year. The bill – which would have required the DOJ Inspector General to conduct inspections of the BOP’s 122 correctional facilities, provide recommendations to problems and assign each facility a risk score – was window-dressing, a political statement with no chance of passage in the waning days of the 117th Congress.

Three months ago, however, Ossoff introduced a revised version of FPOA (S.1401), with Rep. Lucy McBath (D-GA) filing a companion bill in the House (H.R.3109). The new FPOA would have, among other actions, created a hotline for prisoners to report misconduct.

mismanagement210419Now, three months later, the latest effort to reform federal prisons would subject the BOP director to the same congressional scrutiny as other law enforcement agency chiefs such as the director of the FBI, which Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said is needed. “The Director of the Bureau of Prisons oversees more than 34,000 employees and a multi-billion dollar budget, and should be subject to Senate review and confirmation as well,” McConnell said.

Grassley introduced FPAA along with McConnell and Sens Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ), Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), John Cornyn (R-TX), Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mike Braun (R-IN) and Ossoff. With that kind of legislative horsepower behind it – not to mention black eyes like Jeffrey Epstein, Whitey Bulger and Larry Nasser – it’s safe to predict that Director Colette Peters may be the last BOP Director to not be approved by the Senate.

The Hill, Bipartisan senators introduce bill to increase federal prison oversight (July 13, 2023)

Sen. Charles Grassley, Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Increase Accountability at Federal Prisons (July 13, 2023)

Associated Press, Larry Nassar was stabbed in his cell and the attack was not seen by prison cameras, AP source says (July 11, 2023)

Associated Press, Former federal prison guard sent to prison for violating civil rights of injured inmate (July 11, 2023)

Washington Post, Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide reveals grave failures of U.S. prisons (July 10, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Three First Step Reform Retread Bills Introduced – Update for April 24, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DÉJÀ VU ALL OVER AGAIN

deja171017Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-IL), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) last Wednesday reintroduced three of the biggest criminal justice of the last Congress, reform bills that made it out of Senate committee but never got voted on in 2021-2022.

Yogi Berra might say, “It’s déjà vu all over again.”

Durbin and Grassley sponsored First Step five years ago. Now, they have reintroduced the First Step Implementation Act (FSIA) (S. 1251) and Safer Detention Act (S.1248) – both of which were approved by the Committee in 2021 but did not pass the Senate the last Congress – as well as rolled out the Terry Technical Correction Act (S. 1247).

The FSIA would allow courts to apply First Step sentencing reform provisions to reduce sentences imposed prior to First Step’s December 2018 enactment and broaden the drug safety valve (18 USC § 3553(f)) to allow courts to sentence below a mandatory minimum for nonviolent controlled substance offenses, if the court finds the defendant’s criminal history over-represents the seriousness of the defendant’s criminal record and the likelihood of recidivism.

The Safer Detention Act of 2023 would reform the Elderly Home Detention Pilot Program (34 USC § 60541(g)(5)) by clarifying that the time served required for the Program should be calculated based on an inmate’s net sentence – including reductions for good conduct time credits; lowering eligibility to include nonviolent offenders who have served at least 50% (instead of 66.7%) of their terms; and making D.C. Code offenders in BOP custody eligible for the Elderly Home Detention Pilot Program. The bill would also make federal prisoners sentenced before November 1, 1987 eligible for compassionate release.

jordan230425The Terry Technical Corrections Act (S. 1247) broadens the scope of crack cocaine offenders who are eligible for a retroactive sentencing reduction under the First Step Act of 2018. The First Step Act authorized sentencing reductions for crack cocaine offenders convicted and sentenced before the Fair Sentencing Act became effective, as long as their conduct triggered a mandatory minimum sentence. This bill extends eligibility for the retroactive sentencing reduction to all crack cocaine offenders sentenced before the Fair Sentencing Act became effective, including low-level offenders whose conduct did not trigger a mandatory minimum sentence.

Remember that this same trio of modest proposals did not pass even when the Democrats ran the House, the Senate and the White House. Now, the Republicans run the House, with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) chairing a House Judiciary Committee more interested in attacking Democrats for being soft on crime and hard on former President Trump than it is in addressing criminal justice reform.

Writing in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog last Thursday, Ohio State University law prof Doug Berman said, “For a wide variety of reasons, I am not at all hopeful that any form of federal sentencing reform will be enacted in the current Congress. But I was still pleased to learn… that a pair of notable Senators are still seeking to advance some notable (previously stalled) sentencing bills.”

underthesun230424

Kohelet was an old and wise guy when he reputedly wrote the Book of Ecclesiastes. If he were still writing, it would be about these three bills.  Nothing new under the sun, indeed, as will probably be the fate of these three – demise in December 2024, just as the last three died at the end of 2022. At that time, we will be writing of the FSIA, Safer Detention Act and Terry Technical Correction Act, “Vanity of vanities! All is futile! What profit hath a man for all his toil, in which he toils under the sun?”

Reintroduction of the three measures last week came as The Crime Report complained that “after four years, the impact of the First Step Act has been mixed… In March 2022 that there were 208,000 inmates in federal prisons and jails. But only 5,000 inmates… have been released through one or more provisions of the FSA.”

The Crime Report concluded

The sheer number of reforms in the FSA that are the antithesis to the Nixon-era ‘lock-‘em-up-and-throw-away-the-key’ penal philosophy of both the Bureau of Prisons and the US Sentencing Commission make it exceedingly difficult to have the promise of the FSA fulfilled. The very magnitude of the law and its stated objectives, which include reducing recidivism and improving conditions in federal prisons, has resulted in less than what was initially promised by the supporters of FSA.

First Step Implementation Act (S.1251)

Safer Detention Act of 2023 (S.1248)

Terry Technical Corrections Act (S.1247)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Senators Durbin and Grassley introduce again set of First Step follow-up bills (April 20, 2023)

The Crime Report, The Promises Of Federal Criminal Justice Reform: Shortcomings of the First Step Act (April 17, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Senators Consider Sexual Assault (And How to Stop It) – Update for February 7, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

GRASSLEY, DURBIN, PADILLA MEET WITH BOP DIRECTOR PETERS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE SEXUAL MISCONDUCT

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Alex Padilla (D-CA) met with Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters last Wednesday to discuss sexual misconduct by BOP personnel and the Dept of Justice’s efforts to root it out.

sexualassault211014The meeting followed letters that Grassley, Durbin, Padilla, and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) sent to DOJ last year seeking information about sexual misconduct allegations against BOP staffers.

“I appreciate that DOJ convened a Working Group to address sexual misconduct by BOP employees and that BOP has begun implementing reforms to enhance prevention, reporting, investigation, prosecution, and discipline related to staff sexual misconduct,” Durbin said. “DOJ’s report in November was evidence of the desperate need for reform and improved oversight. I will continue pushing BOP and DOJ to ensure that BOP operates federal prisons safely, securely, and effectively.”

The meeting comes as a new report released by the DOJ’s Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that prison and jail staff rarely face legal consequences for sexual assault.

BJS released data on more than 2,500 documented incidents of sexual assault in federal and state prisons and jails between 2016 and 2018. Despite federal laws intended to create zero-tolerance policies for prison sexual abuse, most notably the Prison Rape Elimination Act, the report found that staff sexual misconduct perpetrators were convicted in only 20% of jailhouse incidents and only a 6% of substantiated prison incidents. Fewer than half of the perps lost their jobs.

“Staff sexual misconduct led to the perpetrator’s discharge, termination or employment contract not being renewed in 44 percent of incidents,” the report states. “Staff perpetrators were reprimanded or disciplined following 43% of sexual harassment incidents.”

rape230207Not everyone is sanguine about BOP efforts, nor – according to the report’s findings – should they be. In a recent release, the advocacy group FAMM said, “The Department of Justice (DOJ) is stepping up prosecutions of prison sexual assault. While commendable, jailing the abusers is not enough. It won’t heal survivors’ trauma or stop this from happening in the future. We need independent oversight to make real change. The BOP has shown that it cannot be trusted to mind its own foxes in its own hen houses.”

Sen. Charles Grassley, Grassley, Durbin, Padilla Meet With BOP Director Peters to Further Investigate Sexual Misconduct (February 2, 2023)

DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics, Substantiated Incidents of Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2016–2018 (February 2, 2023)

Reason, New Data Show Prison Staff Are Rarely Held Accountable for Sexual Misconduct (February 3, 2023)

FAMM, How the Department of Justice is Failing Victims of Sexual Assault in Prison (January 24, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Blue Christmas for Criminal Justice Reform – Update for December 27, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta
SENTENCE REFORM DIES WITH 117TH CONGRESS

Sentencing reform is dead for another two years.

bluechristmas221227Of all the criminal justice reform bills in Congress – the First Step Implementation Act (S.1014), the Smarter Sentencing Act (S.1013), the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (S.312), the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act (S.601), the EQUAL Act (S.79) and the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act (H.R. 3617) – exactly none made it past the Senate during the two-year Congress that ends in a week. Zero. Zip. Bupkis.
With both the House nor Senate closed for a Christmas-Passover-Kwanzaa-New Year’s vacation until next Tuesday, the 117th Congress is done. It’s the legislative equivalent to taking a knee in the final minute of a football game. The clock’s running out.

runoutclock221227It was clear last summer that the First Step Implementation Act, the Smarter Sentencing Act, the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (and the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act were going nowhere. But some marijuana and cocaine reform – even though it was not quite what was in the MORE Act and EQUAL Act that passed the House – looked likely as late as last week. However, despite bipartisan support for both bills, Senate Republicans shot them down, but with plenty of help from Senate Democrats and the Biden Administration.

As for marijuana, the Senate’s failure to act comes as a repudiation of Biden’s efforts for pot reform. In October, the president pardoned thousands of people convicted of simple marijuana possession (although no one pardoned was in federal prison) and said his administration would review how the drug is categorized.

The MORE Act would have allowed cannabis companies to open bank accounts and would have retroactively permitted changes in pot-based sentences. But efforts were severely hobbled last fall when Senate Majority Charles Schumer (D-NY), Sen Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Sen Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced their own version of weed reform, the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (S.4591).

Either MORE or CAOA would have been good for prisoners, but Democratic leadership’s push of an alternative bill diluted the groundswell of support needed to get MORE passed. By last week, the only hope was for banking reform – nothing for federal prisoners – but even that was exempted from last week’s giant end-of-year spending bill, the last chance it had for passage.

congressgradecard221227If anything, the EQUAL Act’s failure was a bigger disappointment. Aimed at reducing the disparity in sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine offenses by making crack and powder sentences the same, it would have benefitted thousands of prisoners with retroactive relief. EQUAL passed the House with bipartisan support and had what seemed to be a veto-proof majority of 50 Democrat supporters and 11 Republican Senate co-sponsors.

Then, Sen Charles Grassley (R-IA), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and introduced his SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S. 4116), which watered down EQUAL and put retroactivity in the hands of the Dept of Justice.

Still, EQUAL had a chance until Sen Tom Cotton (R–AR) single-handedly stopped the Senate from considering the bill last Wednesday. EQUAL, like the marijuana-friendly SAFE Banking Act was proposed as an addition to the catch-all spending package, an effort that Cotton frustrated.

Sen. Booker then sought unanimous consent to release the stand-alone version of the EQUAL Act from the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Cotton, a hardline prohibitionist described by Beforeitsnews.com as someone “who has never met a drug penalty he thought was too severe,” objected. Sen. Booker’s “hail Mary” fell short.

Still, it appeared up until a week ago that some crack cocaine relief would be jammed into the giant end-of-year spending bill. Reuters reported a week ago that Senate negotiators had reached a potential compromise.

timing221227But then, Attorney General Merrick Garland picked the middle of the negotiations to issue a memo directing federal prosecutors to “promote the equivalent treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses” in two ways. If they decide that a mandatory minimum should be charged, they should “charge the pertinent statutory quantities that apply to powder cocaine offenses.” And at sentencing, “prosecutors should advocate for a sentence consistent with the guidelines for powder cocaine rather than crack cocaine.”

Grassley was enraged, blasting the Garland memo as demanding that “prosecutors ignore the text and spirit of federal statutes [and] undermining legislative efforts to address this sentencing disparity.” And just like that, when the text of the 4,000-page, $1.7 trillion spending bill was released, the watered-down EQUAL Act was nowhere to be found.

“It is a searing indictment of a broken Beltway when a bill that passed the House with an overwhelming bipartisan vote, endorsed by law enforcement and civil rights leaders alike, with 11 Republican co-sponsors and filibuster-proof majority support in the Senate, and an agreement between the relevant committee Chairman and Ranking Member for inclusion in the end-of-year package, fails to make it to the President’s desk,” Holly Harris, president and executive director of the Justice Action Network, said. “The American people deserve better.”

FAMM vice president Molly Gill wants to see the EQUAL Act reintroduced next session. The politics are hard to predict: Democrats have one more seat in the Senate, while Republicans will take narrow control of the House.

The fact that a large number of House Republicans joined Democrats in passing the EQUAL Act last year is not reassuring: the trick will be getting a Republican speaker – who controls what comes up for a vote – put the bill in front of the chamber.

Any bill now pending in the House or Senate that has not passed will disappear on Jan 3, when the new 2-year Congress – the 118th – convenes. And we will start all over again, but with a much unfriendlier House of Representatives.

New Republic: Three Incredibly Popular Things That Congress Chose to Leave Out of the Spending Bill (December 20, 2022)

Reason, Congress Yet Again Fails To Pass Crack Cocaine Sentencing Reforms (December 20, 2022)

Marijuana Moment, Schumer’s “last ditch” cannabis banking push (December 19, 2022)

Reason, Merrick Garland’s New Charging Policy Aims To Ameliorate the Damage His Boss Did As a Drug Warrior (December 19, 2022)

Beforeitsnews.com, The Failure To Enact Marijuana Banking and Crack Sentencing Reforms Is a Window on Congressional Dysfunction (December 22, 2022)

Filter, The Limits of AG’s Guidelines Against Crack-Powder Sentencing Disparity (December 21, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

Criminal Justice Reform Efforts Die In 117th Congress With a Whimper – Update for December 20, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

SENATE CRACK COMPROMISE AND POT REFORM ARE DEAD

As of last Thursday, negotiators in the Senate had reportedly reached a tentative deal to narrow sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine from 18:1 to 2.5:1. Then, enter Merrick Garland…

congressbroken220330First, the compromise: Reuters reported that its sources said senators planned to tuck the measure into a bill funding the government. Under the deal reached, the crack/powder weight disparity would be narrowed to 2.5 to 1, but the change would not be retroactive. The Senate would attach the change to a year-end spending bill, which has been delayed for another week.

The compromise is the death knell for the EQUAL Act (S.79), which would have made crack and powder equal in sentence severity and would have been retroactive. EQUAL, which passed the House last year, has been in trouble in the Senate since Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), the highest-ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, introduced the SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116), which embodied the 2.5-to-1 ratio. proportion instead.

Then, the Dept of Justice: The compromise was shaky even before the DOJ announced relaxed crack charging policies last Friday. Those changes angered Sen. Grassley, who warned that “it undermines legislative efforts to address this sentencing disparity.” Yesterday, the compromise seems to have gone to hell.

Two sources told Reuters yesterday that even the 2.5:1 negotiations have stalled. After Friday’s DOJ announcement, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) joined Sen. Grassley in opposing the compromise. One source told Reuters that last-minute negotiations to tuck the measure into the year-end spending bill continued yesterday morning, but “inclusion was no longer seen as likely.”

nochance221220At this point, neither the EQUAL Act nor retroactivity nor even the watered-down SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act has any chance to pass in this Congress. Why the Attorney General had to choose Friday to stick his thumb in Chuck Grassley’s eye is anyone’s guess.

Marijuana reform this year is equally dead. Last Thursday, Sen Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, signaled that marijuana reform might be on hold until the next Congress in 2023. The modest changes being considered now do not address any criminal justice reform. Brown told Marijuana Moment he is interested in the “expanded SAFE Plus bill that Senate leadership has been finalizing because it’s expected to go beyond simple banking reform and also contain other provisions dealing with expungements and more.”

Today, Marijuana Moment reported:

Congressional staffers confirmed to Marijuana Moment that cannabis banking language is not being included in the omnibus appropriations bill despite a final push by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and other supporters from both parties. Advocates will now look ahead to 2023 and the possibility of advancing the cannabis reform in a divided Congress.

marijuana220412Sen Cory Booker, (D-NJ) said last week that Sen. McConnell is standing in the way of the lame-duck Congress passing any marijuana-related bills before the end of the year. NJ Advance Media reports that McConnell’s opposition to any marijuana bill “is giving Senate Republicans who support the measure cold feet, said Booker, who is helping to lead the effort to enact legislation before Republicans take control of the House in January and most likely prevent any bill from passing in the next two years.”

Congress is not completely impotent when it comes to prison and criminal justice reform. Last Wednesday, the House passed The Prison Camera Reform Act (S.2899) – approved by the Senate last year – and sent it to President Biden for signature. The bill requires the Bureau of Prisons to fix broken surveillance cameras and install new ones, “providing upgraded tools to fight and investigate staff misconduct, inmate violence and other problems,” according to industry publication Corrections1.

Reuters, U.S. Senate set to address cocaine sentencing disparity in funding bill (December 15, 2022)

Reuters, U.S. Senate Talks on Cocaine Sentencing Reform Hit Roadblock (December 19, 2022)

SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116)

Marijuana Moment, Key Senate Chairman Signals Marijuana Banking Will Wait Until 2023, Says There’s ‘Interest In The Republican House’ (December 15, 2022)

Marijuana Moment, Cannabis banking left out of omnibus (Newsletter: December 20, 2022)

NJ.com, Mitch McConnell is blocking all marijuana legislation in Congress, N.J.’s Booker says (December 15, 2022)

Prison Camera Reform Act of 2021 (S.2899)

Corrections1, Congress passes Prison Camera Reform Act (December 16, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

DOJ Uses Guidance Memos to Try to Effect Crack Cocaine Reform – Update for December 19, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

CRACK REFORM COMETH… BUT IT’S TEMPORARY AND DOESN’T HELP ANYONE ALREADY LOCKED UP

Attorney General Merrick Garland has instructed federal prosecutors to end disparities in the way they charge offenses involving crack cocaine and powder cocaine.

crackpowder160606The change, outlined in two internal memos released by the Dept of Justice on Friday, is a “win for criminal justice reform advocates, who point out that the current sentencing regime has led to the disproportionate incarceration of Black Americans since the policy was adopted nearly 40 years ago,” Reuters said.

The new policy will take effect within 30 days. It does not apply retroactively. This means anyone sentenced under the harsher 18;1 ratio has no way to have his or her sentence adjusted to reflect what Congress now believes is fair.

The memos argue that “the crack/powder disparity in sentencing has no basis in science, furthers no law enforcement purposes, and drives unwarranted racial disparities in our criminal justice system.” Garland instructed prosecutors to treat “crack cocaine defendants no differently than for defendants in powder cocaine cases” when charging defendants and making sentencing recommendations.

They also instruct prosecutors to reserve charges involving mandatory minimums to situations with certain aggravating factors, such as leadership, possession of a gun, gang membership, or a history of violence.

“Today’s announcement recognizes this injustice and takes steps to finally strike parity between powder and crack cocaine sentences,” Sen Cory Booker (D-NJ), a sponsor of the EQUAL Act (S.79), said in a statement.

grassley180604But Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), whose SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116) – introduced last summer – is responsible for derailing the EQUAL Act, was displeased. “A bipartisan group of lawmakers, including myself, just recently came to an agreement on statutory changes that could possibly be included in the year-end funding bill,” Grassley said in a statement. “That hard-won compromise has been jeopardized because the attorney general inappropriately took lawmaking into his own hands. The administration could have engaged in the real and lasting legislative process, but opted for flimsy guidance that will disintegrate when this administration leaves office.”

Although Garland’s new charging policy has no retroactive effect, Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman noted in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog that “federal law does provide at least one possible means for Garland’s memo to retroactively apply to some previous crack convictions: AG Garland could have prosecutors bring, and vocally and consistently support, motions for sentence reductions under 3582(c)(1)(A) for crack offenders who are still serving unduly long and unfair crack sentences based in the unjust disparity.”

Reuters, U.S. Justice Department moves to eliminate cocaine sentencing disparity (December 16, 2022)

Washington Post, Garland moves to end disparities in crack cocaine sentencing (December 17, 2022)

Dept of Justice, General Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing (December 16, 2022)

Dept of Justice, Additional Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing in Drug Cases (December 16, 2022)

BBC, US to end crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity (December 16, 2022)

Press Release, Grassley Statement On Justice Department’s Usurpation Of Legislative Authority, Disregard For Statutes As Written On Cocaine Prosecutions (December 16, 2022)

Sentencing Law and Policy, US Attorney General Garland releases new federal charging guidelines that include instructions to treat crack like powder cocaine (December 16, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta